Facebook 'Like' Lands Man in Court
A Swiss man is being sued for defamation for "liking" Facebook posts. But the court case looks set to concentrate on the individuals involved, rather than the technological principle.
"The Local," a English-language Swiss news site, reports that the man had clicked the "like" button beside eight different posts by a range of animal rights groups. Each of the posts accused another man involved in the animal rights movement of anti-Semitism and racism. (Source: thelocal.ch)
It's an intriguing legal point as technically the man being sued for libel has not written anything on the topic, let along something defamatory. However, the lawyers for the man bringing the case say that by liking the posts, he made them more visible.
Likes Increase Visibility
Technically this could be true as Facebook's algorithm means many of the defendant's friends will have seen the posts appear in their own newsfeeds, but would not have done so had he not clicked the like button.
This follows on from other cases, including in the UK, where courts concluded that to "retweet" a Twitter post counted as fresh publication and made the "retweeter" responsible for the contents of the post despite not writing it. However, Swiss courts took the opposite view when they ruled on similar cases. (Source: thenextweb.com)
It could be argued that Twitter users know and intend that a retweet will show the post to more people, whereas Facebook users don't necessarily understand the effects of liking a post.
Lawyers Say Posts Were True, Anyhow
In the Swiss case, the lawyers bringing forth the defamation case say the defendant deliberately tried to harm the man the posts were about and that he did so without any "justifiable cause." Both of these points are relevant to Swiss law on libel.
The problem for the tech world is that the case likely won't settle the point in Swiss law, let alone set an example that might influence courts in other countries. That's because the defendant's lawyers don't plan on arguing on whether or not a "like" should count as a potentially defamatory publication. Instead, they'll argue that the man bringing the libel action has a conviction for racial abuse and that the content of the eight posts in question is in fact true.
What's Your Opinion?
Should liking a post count as republishing it when it comes to defamation cases? Were you aware that clicking on the like button will increase the number of people who see a post? Have you ever held off on liking or sharing social media content because you believed it might be defamatory?
Infopackets Top Windows 10 FAQs
How to Upgrade from Windows 10 32-bit to 64-bit
How to Fix: Windows 10 Antivirus Missing, Not Compatible
How to Fix: Windows 10 Display Shifted; Screen Fuzzy
How to Upgrade Windows 7, 8 32-bit to Windows 10 64-bit
to Downgrade from Windows 10
- How to Fix: Windows 10 Upgrade Failed Error C1900208
- How to Fix: Windows 10 Upgrade Failed Error 80240020
- Can I Cancel my Windows 10 Reservation and Reserve Later?
- How to Clean Install Windows 10 using Windows 7, 8 License
- Will Windows 10 Install Automatically?
- Windows 10 Upgrade: Do I have to Reinstall Programs?
- Windows 10 Upgrade: Can I choose 32-bit or 64-bit?
- Which Version of Windows 10 Will I Get (Home or Pro)?
- How to Reserve Windows 10 Upgrade (Free)
- How to Fix: CPU Not Compatible with Windows 10 Error
- Windows 10 Upgrade: Can I keep my Old Windows Install?
- How to Cancel Windows 10 Reservation (Properly)
- Download Windows 10 .ISO (DVD) for Clean Install?
- Microsoft: Windows 10 Will Be The Last Version
- Does Windows 10 require the CPU to support PAE?
- Windows 10: Can I Upgrade or do I need a Clean Install?
Click here for more Windows 10 articles.