Facebook Patents AI that Posts After You Die
Facebook Patents AI that Posts After You Die
Facebook's owners have patented an AI tool that could continue posting on behalf of a user who has died. There's no sign it plans on using the technology but it has still raised some significant ethical questions.
Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, applied for the patent in 2023. It was finally granted in December and then spotted by Business Insider. (Source: businessinsider.com)
The patent covers a technology that would allow the company to simulate a user's activity when they are unable to post for an extended period. That could be because of illness, time away for work, or if the user dies.
Auto-Likes and Comments
Bizarrely, the patent application says the tech would solve the problem of a user's absence affecting other users who followed them on a social media site. It makes the somewhat understated point that "The impact on the [followers] is much more severe and permanent if that user is deceased and can never return to the social networking platform."
Although AI-generated posts would seem the most obvious use case, the patent suggests it would be more about simulating other activity such as leaving comments on other people's posts and "liking" content. The idea would be to analyze past behavior and then act how the algorithm determined the user would have responded to other content.
"No Plans" to Develop Concept
What value that brings either the user (if they are still alive), or the people whose content are receiving automated "likes" and comments is not entirely clear.
Meta says that it has "no plans to move forward" with the technology and that filing a patent does not mean it will turn a concept into a working technology. It's possible it began working on the idea and has since concluded it would be poorly received. It's also possible its more of a defensive patent that means it could block other companies from using the technology. (Source: dexerto.com)
Facebook Acquires AI Agent Social Network
The concept of AI bots interacting on social networks is not purely theoretical. Just a few days ago, Meta acquired a startup called Moltbook, which built a social network specifically designed for AI agents. On that platform, automated bots can generate posts, reply to comments and interact with one another much like human users.
According to reports, the Moltbook platform effectively functions as a social network where AI agents hold discussions and produce content autonomously. Meta reportedly brought the startup's founders into its Superintelligence Labs, suggesting the company is exploring how autonomous AI agents might interact on social platforms in the future.
Elements of this idea already exist on other platforms. For example, on X (formerly Twitter), users can mention the platform's AI assistant by typing @grok in a post and asking it to analyze or comment on a tweet. The AI then replies publicly in the conversation thread, demonstrating how automated agents can already participate directly in social media discussions alongside human users.
What's Your Opinion?
Are you surprised by this filing? Do you think Meta will ever use the technology? Is the concept acceptable as long as the user gives (or gave) their express consent?

My name is Dennis Faas and I am a senior systems administrator and IT technical analyst specializing in technical support and cyber crimes with over 30 years experience; I also run this website! If you need technical assistance , I can help. Click here to email me now; optionally, you can review my resume here. You can also read how I can fix your computer over the Internet (also includes user reviews).
We are BBB Accredited
We are BBB accredited (A+ rating), celebrating 21 years of excellence! Click to view our rating on the BBB.
Comments
AI is getting a bit crazy
There's clearly a need for AI, and it can be extremely useful depending on how it is applied. For example, I am currently working on a major project to upgrade this website and move it to another content management system (CMS). That part is now done, but the site itself still needs a major overhaul.
I'm currently using AI to help accomplish this, and there is absolutely NO WAY I could have done it without AI unless I paid a developer tens of thousands of dollars. I've even embedded AI into the operating system (sectioned off using a Docker image - similar to a virtual machine running inside another virtual machine) and am using it to write programs that interact with other programs I created in order to deeply automate the process.
Prior to that, I was using ChatGPT to generate scripts that I would run inside my virtual machine, but about 7 out of 10 times, the scripts were wrong and I had to keep going back and forth asking ChatGPT to fix them. Some problems took three or four days to resolve - which aggravated me beyond reason.
This new technology (ChatGPT's Codex CLI) only emerged around mid February of this year, yet it has already been a GODSEND and has increased my productivity by an estimated 10,000 percent. This is definition of useful AI.
What is not useful is AI chatbots posting on a dead person's account - or deploying automated accounts designed to manipulate public opinion and push political ideologies such as Democratic Marxism masquerading as full blown Communism, for example.