FCC Drops Gigabit Target, Approves SpaceX Plan
FCC Drops Gigabit Target, Approves SpaceX Plan
The Federal Communications Commission (FTC) has ditched a long-term target of gigabit broadband deployment. Ironically, it's also approved plans for satellite services which could make such speeds more widely available.
The target involves the official definition of broadband which is used for determining whether the FCC can and take action to push for faster speeds. This includes subsidies and other funding, and measures designed to boost competition.
The threshold was last raised in 2024, from 25Mbps download/3 Mbps upload to 100 Mbps/20Mbps. At the time the FCC said this better reflected the services on offer and the expectations of consumers.
At the time the FCC adopted a long term goal of 1Gbps for downloads and 500 Mbps for uploads, though didn't put a timeline on adopting that threshold.
Scrapping the Target
Now under new leadership, the FCC has abolished the goal and is citing two reasons. One is that there is no need to have a goal because there is no way of knowing what consumers will consider sufficient speeds in the future.
The other, more controversial, reason is that a 1Gbps threshold would be "unreasonably prejudicial" to some forms of broadband such as satellite and mobile data which cannot support such speeds. That was presented as an interpretation of net neutrality principles, though critics say that is not the intention of such principles. (Source: arstechnica.com)
The change does not affect a separate rule which says the government will only offer grants for companies to expand Internet provision (for example, in unprofitable regions) if they offer speeds of at least 1Gbps.
Satellite Expansion
Ironically, given the explanation that the threshold might discriminate against satellite technology, the FCC has authorized (and partly funded) a Space X plan to launch a further 7,500 "second generation" satellites which use a higher communications frequency and a lower orbiting altitude. The company says this will allow it to offer both upload and download speeds of 1Gbps worldwide.
The FCC justified the decision by saying that it will expand high-speed access and provide more competition in areas which currently have only one option for Internet service. (Source: satnews.com)
What's Your Opinion?
Do you think 1Gbps should be the standard for broadband? Is it fair to lower goals to accommodate slower technologies like mobile data? Would you switch to satellite Internet if it offered gigabit speeds?

My name is Dennis Faas and I am a senior systems administrator and IT technical analyst specializing in technical support and cyber crimes with over 30 years experience; I also run this website! If you need technical assistance , I can help. Click here to email me now; optionally, you can review my resume here. You can also read how I can fix your computer over the Internet (also includes user reviews).
We are BBB Accredited
We are BBB accredited (A+ rating), celebrating 25 years of excellence! Click to view our rating on the BBB.
Comments
Sattelite
I haven't kept up with the latest tech like I used to therefore, I do not know if the following question is even relevant. With sattelite broadband, isn't there still a problem with latency issues, cloud cover, storms, etc...?
Broadband definition
"The threshold was last raised in 2024, from 25Mbps download/3 Mbps upload to 100 Mbps/200Mbps"
I think you mean to write 100Mbps/20Mbps, not 200.
Thanks
Thanks for catching that.
Switch to satellite?
Many friends in the RV community are rushing to Starlink as their provider of choice. With roaming services available, why not just ditch the local provider. Though I'm not (yet) a full-time RV dweller, I'm looking at travelling enough that switching to Starlink for home and highway might make the best economic sense.
Cell providers are apparently thinking the same way and using satellites to fill gaps in coverage, so using "satellite internet" may not even need to be a consumer choice.
And thanks for your observation, Bill Gruber. I thought 200Mpbs looked wrong, but didn'/don't know if 20 would be the correct number.