Windows 10 Security Patches 'Must Continue'

Windows 10 Security Patches 'Must Continue'

John Lister's picture

A campaign group want users to sign a petition calling on Microsoft to automatically extend support for Windows 10. It says existing plans where users can sign up to an extra year of support cheaply or free of charge don't go far enough.

The petition is the work of the Public Interest Research Group (PIRG), which describes itself as "an advocate for consumers, advancing solutions to problems that affect our health, our safety and our wellbeing." It commonly campaigns on tech topics including the "right to repair" as a way to benefit consumers while reducing environmental waste.

Millions Of Machines Not Upgradable

Windows 10 reaches its "end of life" in October, meaning Microsoft no longer issues automatic security updates. Originally it planned to only offer "extended support", a paid security patch program, to business users.

It later announced home users could pay $30 for the first year to continue getting security fixes. It then went a step further and said users could redeem Microsoft Store points (earned among other ways by using Bing as a search tool) to get the updates. It is also waiving the fee altogether for people who agree to backup their Windows settings to the cloud.

PIRG argues that doesn't go far enough. It claims 40 percent of Windows 10 computers can't be upgraded to Windows 11 because of Microsoft's chosen hardware requirements. It fear users choosing between running an insecure system or throwing working computers into landfill. (Source: pirg.org)

Related: What Happens When Windows 10 Reaches End of Life?

Automatic Updates 'Best Option'

According to PIRG, the issue is so serious that relying on users acting to take up the extended support isn't enough. It thinks that this approach "won't make a dent" in the number of machines which could lose security support.

Instead, it wants Microsoft to simply continue issuing automatic security patches, in effect recognizing that people want to (and will) continue running Windows 10 and that it therefore needs to keep supporting the system. PIRG argues that Microsoft making security patches a paid (or at least restricted) option is "a business decision, not a technical one." (Source: theregister.com)

What's Your Opinion?

Do you support this campaign? Does Microsoft have a moral duty to continue automatically patching Windows 10 for all users? Do you think it will agree to the request and simply extend the end of life date?

Rate this article: 
Average: 5 (10 votes)

Comments

Dennis Faas's picture

I've always wondered why a tech company hasn't created a USB-based TPM that would allow older machines a way to run TPM so that they could still upgrade to Windows 11. I now have my answer here in a separate article if anyone is interested in reading it:

No USB-based TPM for Win11? Here's Why it Won't Work

randyh2's picture

I definitely agree! Wasn't Windows 10 supposed to be the last one?
And a workaround I used on an I7 was RUFUS, which deleted the TPM etc. restrictions and allowed me to upgrade to Win 11.

dhawks45_16272's picture

Before I even upgraded to Win 10 from Win 7 I remember the ads for Win 10, you will never need to buy another, but they got around it by making the requirements of the machine something that MOST machine owners did not have as part of their motherboard (TPM). I a one of those people who built his own machine. I purchase a new MB. I did not see any advertisement or anything else referring to TPM. The machine I built back then(2016) still works like a champ. I bought and paid for Windows 10 with the belief that I would need no other.
So now Microsoft is telling me and so many others that because of their requirements, that my machine and millions of others will be susceptible to viruses and possible intrusions by crooks from far off countries because Microsoft has failed to keep their word.
After years of complete dedication to the Window Operating system, it may be time to explore other systems. And I hate to say it, maybe even Apple.

olds97_lss's picture

So, if you had/have a machine without TPM, I'm assuming you're currently "not secure" and haven't been since computers with TPM came out and it started getting utilized.

So if I force W11 to run on a PC without it, am I any less "secure" than I was while running W10 all this time?

That aside, my computer says it has TPM2.0 (using tpm.msc to see it), but W11 still wouldn't install. My CPU is an i7-6700 which is 2 series below the "supported" CPU's.

I rufus'd it to install W11 and it's been fine so far.

I also upgraded a spare work laptop and my wife's laptop (both are dell e6540, i7-4800mq), neither of which have TPM.