New Law Would Block Authorities From Reading Emails
A U.S. senator wants to close a legal loophole that allows law enforcement officials to read private emails without first obtaining a warrant.
If successful, the change would mean users of webmail services, such as Gmail and Hotmail, will receive extra protection against prying eyes.
Private email content is currently protected by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986. However, email usage is far greater today than it was then, and new procedures leave open the opportunity for officials to read private emails in secret.
Years ago most email users downloaded their messages, which requires their Internet service provider to transmit the message from its servers to the user's computer. After that, the Internet provider no longer had access to the message.
Except for being electronic, the process wasn't much different than when the post office physically delivered a letter.
Webmail Brings Unwelcome Loophole
Today, most people use webmail services, which allow their emails to reside not only on their own computers, but also on the computers of their email provider, ready for access from any computer.
This is significant because the Privacy Act of 1986 allowed law enforcement officials to access any message without a warrant if it had not been accessed by the recipient for 180 days after it was originally sent. In effect, the law considered such messages to have been abandoned. (Source: nbcnews.com)
Given how today's webmail services operate, the design of the outdated law creates a major loophole. Technically, officials without a warrant can insist on seeing any webmail message that is six months old or older, even if the user has received the message on his or her computer.
Plan Would Protect All Emails
Senator Patrick Leahy is now proposing an amendment to the Electronic Communications Privacy Act that would close this loophole. It would treat all emails in the same way, forcing police to obtain a warrant before they could access any message, of any vintage, as part of an investigation. (Source: arstechnica.com)
The amendment is carefully worded in an attempt to cover all electronic communication, including messages on social networking services such as Facebook and Twitter. It's also designed to cover files on remote storage sites, such as Dropbox or SkyDrive.
Leahy's amendment would still allow law enforcement officials access to certain data without a warrant. For example, officials could still demand to see where a person of interest had sent a message from, or to whom he or she had sent it.
Only the actual contents of messages would come under the protection of the new amendment.
Infopackets Top Windows 10 FAQs
How to Upgrade from Windows 10 32-bit to 64-bit
How to Fix: Windows 10 Antivirus Missing, Not Compatible
How to Fix: Windows 10 Display Shifted; Screen Fuzzy
How to Upgrade Windows 7, 8 32-bit to Windows 10 64-bit
to Downgrade from Windows 10
- How to Fix: Windows 10 Upgrade Failed Error C1900208
- How to Fix: Windows 10 Upgrade Failed Error 80240020
- Can I Cancel my Windows 10 Reservation and Reserve Later?
- How to Clean Install Windows 10 using Windows 7, 8 License
- Will Windows 10 Install Automatically?
- Windows 10 Upgrade: Do I have to Reinstall Programs?
- Windows 10 Upgrade: Can I choose 32-bit or 64-bit?
- Which Version of Windows 10 Will I Get (Home or Pro)?
- How to Reserve Windows 10 Upgrade (Free)
- How to Fix: CPU Not Compatible with Windows 10 Error
- Windows 10 Upgrade: Can I keep my Old Windows Install?
- How to Cancel Windows 10 Reservation (Properly)
- Download Windows 10 .ISO (DVD) for Clean Install?
- Microsoft: Windows 10 Will Be The Last Version
- Does Windows 10 require the CPU to support PAE?
- Windows 10: Can I Upgrade or do I need a Clean Install?
Click here for more Windows 10 articles.